Audrey Hudson of Human Events quotes me in a new article:

Politicians and their supporters use interesting tactics to intimidate
and silence their critics, from rumor-mongering to editorial cartoons,
even dueling pistols.
But the target of a high-profile lawsuit
who is also a relentless investigator of the Obama administration says
the judicial system is being used to retaliate against him.
“The
President of the United States has an unprecedented and uncanny desire
to silence those who report the truth about him,” says media mogul
Andrew Breitbart. […]
Exhibit B, Breitbart says, is how the Left used the apparatus of the
mainstream media to target other enemies, such as author David Freddoso
and commentator Stanley Kurtz.
Freddoso, who wrote The Case Against Barack Obama, a New York Times best
seller, “was called a hack, and whatever else they could think of,”
Matthew Vadum […] tells HUMAN
EVENTS.
In an American Spectator article Vadum penned during the
campaign season, he outlined an Obama campaign memo he obtained urging
followers to stir up trouble for Freddoso.
Vadum told HUMAN EVENTS that “leftist radicals don’t really like free
speech unless it goes their way.”  The courts, it appears, are their
final option to shut down the opposition.
“When they don’t like
what you stand for, they want the police to harass you or they take you
to court.  That’s not supposed to happen in a constitutional Republic
like the United States,” Vadum said.
“This is thug politics straight out of Chicago,” Vadum said.  “Al Capone would have been pleased.” […]