New Virginia attorney general urges Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Virginia’s new Republican attorney general is urging the Supreme Court to overturn its 49-year-old ruling in Roe v. Wade and return the regulation of abortion to the states, as observers await the court’s imminent decision in a challenge to a Mississippi abortion law.

Against this backdrop, the Supreme Court has denied requests to stay the Texas “heartbeat” law which bans abortions after six weeks of gestation and crowdsources enforcement to members of the public.

Litigation is continuing in the case involving Whole Woman’s Health, which runs abortion clinics in Texas and five other states. Whole Woman’s Health sued to overturn the new Texas law, arguing that it violates Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), in which the Supreme Court discovered a constitutionally protected right to obtain an abortion before the fetus is viable, at about the 24-week mark. The chain of clinics also challenged the novel enforcement mechanism that relies on individuals filing lawsuits.

In a Jan. 21 letter (pdf) to the clerk of the Supreme Court on the letterhead of Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares, who took office earlier this month, his subordinate, Virginia Solicitor General Andrew N. Ferguson, advised the court that his boss has changed position in the case known as Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

The Dobbs case was heard by the Supreme Court on Dec. 1, 2021. It is a challenge by the only state-licensed abortion clinic in Mississippi to the state’s Gestational Age Act, which allows abortions after 15 weeks’ gestation only for medical emergencies or severe fetal abnormality. Citing Roe v. Wade, lower courts held the statute was unconstitutional.

Back in September, when Democrats controlled the office of attorney general, governor, and lieutenant governor in Virginia, the state signed on to a brief with 22 states and the District of Columbia that argued “Mississippi’s prohibition on pre-viability abortions is—and should remain—unconstitutional, based on precedent,” the letter to the Supreme Court states.

But with the switch from pro-choice Democratic officeholders to pro-life Republican officeholders, Virginia’s position in the Mississippi appeal had to change from an unconditional pro-choice stance to a more nuanced federalist position that would allow the states to decide the issue.

“Following the change in administration on Jan. 15, 2022, the attorney general has reconsidered Virginia’s position in this case,” the letter states.

“The purpose of this letter is to notify the court that Virginia no longer adheres to the arguments contained in its previously filed brief. Virginia is now of the view that the Constitution is silent on the question of abortion, and that it is therefore up to the people in the several states to determine the legal status and regulatory treatment of abortion.”

Virginia now takes the position that the Roe and Casey cases were “wrongly decided,” and agrees with Justice Clarence Thomas’s dissent in June Medical Services v. Russo (2020), which stated that those “decisions created the right to abortion out of whole cloth, without a shred of support from the Constitution’s text.” The “rootlessness of the right to abortion has made this court’s abortion jurisprudence unworkable,” Thomas added.

“This court should restore judicial neutrality to the abortion debate by permitting the people of the several states to resolve these questions for themselves,” the letter concludes.

This article by Matthew Vadum appeared Jan. 26, 2022, in The Epoch Times.